I suppose Aristotle and eudaimonia don't matter much?
(Have I been barking up the wrong, er, uh, mountain all this time? Here I was, thinking that it was Aristotelianism, with its own highly assimilationist character - the most important things assimilated being concretes in everyday practical reality, not so much abstract theories - that provided a most satisfactory dialectical resolution of the other theories in addition to being essentially correct in its own right. Well, shit. Parfit 1, UP 0?)